Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from hotmail.com ([209.185.241.64]) by truman.olsusa.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35)
          with SMTP id com for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>;
          Tue, 19 Oct 1999 14:52:53 -0400
Received: (qmail 11185 invoked by uid 0); 19 Oct 1999 18:57:01 -0000
Received: from 209.114.165.24 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:56:58 PDT
Message-ID: <19991019185701.11184.qmail@hotmail.com>
From: "Brad Witherell" <bwitherell@hotmail.com>
To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Subject: Standard Stabilizer vs MK-II Stabilizer
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 14:56:58 EDT
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Mime-Version: 1.0

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
I am in the process of finishing a partly built Lancair 360.
The horizontal stabilizer is the standard smaller one. My question, is it 
worth it to cut it off and replace it with the newer one? How is the 
handling as compared to the newer stabilizer? Has anyone done it? And how 
difficult of a project is it going to be?

Any help
Thanks,
Brad
bwitherell@hotmail.com

[Big tail.... small tail.... lots of people happy both ways.  As for how
much work to replace, big job as you'll have to build the new MKII tail
and then install it.  Great big job if your vertical stabilizer is
already attached... Mike Campbell (Dream Catcher) took a handsaw to his
small tail and suggested that it was a major project to change over a
finished kit.  I'm sure there will be plenty of other opinions as well.

  <Marv>          }

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html