Return-Path: Received: from hotmail.com ([207.82.250.249]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 13:57:02 -0400 Received: (qmail 13395 invoked by uid 0); 19 Oct 1999 18:01:06 -0000 Received: from 163.206.104.104 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:01:06 PDT Message-ID: <19991019180106.13394.qmail@hotmail.com> From: "ED SIKORA" To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Hysol 9339 properties... Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:01:06 PDT X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I was researching the properties of Hysol 9339 vs 9430 (the stuff Aircraft Spruce sells) and noted: Hysol 9339 vs 9430 Tensile Lap Shear Strength 4500 psi 4700 psi Peel Strength 20 lb/in 62 lb/in Working Time 2.5 hrs 40 min According to Dave Godfrey (Dexter-Hysol Aerospace Technical support @925-458-8278) when they formulated the 9339 to get a longer working time they got a reduced peel strength over the 9430. Seeing these numbers, for small applications (not closeout of wings etc) would not the 9430 seem to be a better candidate? -Ed Sikora 235 (290 maybe) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html