X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:13:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from apophis.email.starband.net ([148.78.247.50] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1111382 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:39:39 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=148.78.247.50; envelope-from=hwasti@starband.net Received: from starband.net (vsat-148-64-23-255.c050.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.64.23.255]) by apophis.email.starband.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4D0ci9m011394 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 20:38:53 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <44652A87.1090602@starband.net> X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:38:31 -0700 From: "Hamid A. Wasti" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IVP Crash References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on apophis.email.starband.net X-Virus-Status: Clean > Posted for Jack Cowell : > > If the assertions are valid, or even partially valid, then the > affected Lancair pilots owe him a debt of gratitude for bringing this > situation to light. If, on the other hand, the assertions are found > to be > wanting either in specificity, fact, completeness or other significant > category, that would be beneficial for all of us - not the least of > whom is > Mr. Ayers -- to know and understand as well. The most significant thing the facts will show is that Mr. Ayers is hiding the fact that he has a commercial motive to attack Lancair as he is developing a competing product. Regards, Hamid