Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:26:21 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-814882@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <colyncase@earthlink.net>
Received: from mail.pshift.com ([63.166.217.30] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0)
  with ESMTP id 814298 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:07:24 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.166.217.30; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
Received: from ccaselt (unverified [206.229.199.193]) by mail.pshift.com
 (Vircom SMTPRS 4.1.361.21) with SMTP id <B0216069330@mail.pshift.com> for <lml@lancaironline.net>;
 Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:06:11 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <115e01c5e0f5$16810250$0202a8c0@nvidia.com>
From: "colyncase on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-812819@logan.com>
Subject:  [LML] Re: LNC2 Oil Lines
X-Original-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 20:06:09 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180

Can someone refresh my memory why you would want a remote
oil filter, given the added risk of the oil hoses failing?

Colyn