Return-Path: Received: from baron.nii.net ([209.113.172.16]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 23:50:45 -0400 Received: from nii.net (xcom13.nii.net [209.113.173.77]) by baron.nii.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA11734 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 23:54:23 -0400 Message-ID: <37C8B12C.405D0DCA@nii.net> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 00:03:56 -0400 From: "Angier M. Ames" Organization: Alpha Delta Research To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: Ram air References: <19990828042509.AAA2248@truman.olsusa.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Seems to me I remember some remnant of a fragment of data from my student days to the effect that there is a mathamatical limit to the amount of compression achievable on a molecule of air in normally aspirated aircraft engines. As I recall, it works out to one atmosphere (14psi) at the speed of sound. Now our little planes do not yet approach the speed of sound, but at 200mph at sea level,in theory one ought to be able to design a ram air system which would give you something in excess of 3psi boost. I don't know of any instance where this level of performance increase has been documented so perhaps it is extremely difficult to achieve in the real world. Any comments, real or imaginary, fact or fiction, together with design tricks, illustrations and or photographs of neat installations would be greatly appreciated. Angier Ames >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html