X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0c2) with HTTP id 732339 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:51:18 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Lancair approved inspectors? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0c2 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:51:18 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <004c01c5c0b0$ce493b10$6801a8c0@compaqvdhfeuva> References: <004c01c5c0b0$ce493b10$6801a8c0@compaqvdhfeuva> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Jack Cowell : The information I was given was that the requirements you listed were so that Lancair could try to reduce the cost of insurance to builders/flyers. My understanding is that new builders are not "required" to do anything vis a vis insurance. They must, however, comply with the specifications Lancair worked out with its insurance underwriter IF they want to participate in this specific insurance program. Further, my insurance (for a IVP) already requires that I had a factory-authorized person check out my airplane for airworthiness and that I receive an annual recurrency/checkride from a Lancair-designated person. This had been the case with my insurance broker and carrier for three years. As to being "stonewalled", I know nothing about that, but it does seem possible that since the Lancair CEO/pro-active insurance coverage negotiator is a part time New Orleans resident and businessman/lawyer his attention may have been distracted for the time being.