X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0c2)
  with HTTP id 732332 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:49:32 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: approved inspectors/pilots
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0c2
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:49:32 -0400
Message-ID: <web-732332@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <960dddc37f85d40b30d8285af4228fb5@pacbell.net>
References: <list-731749@logan.com>
 <960dddc37f85d40b30d8285af4228fb5@pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for morss <morss@pacbell.net>:

  At last I heard I was approved for all models of lancair aircraft. Ive built
a 320 and legacy,was the original test pilot on the IV, ES and turbine IV and
am approved by most insurance companies. I am also a DAR and can license your
plane as well. for the full story www.davemorss.com.
  As to the suggestion that lancair cover this expense My only relationship
with lancair is as a customer and to occasionally steel a race prop at reno.
While I dont know how this requirement came to be if you saw some of the
examples of building you would realize the huge differences in the quality of
construction that are out there. I think lancair just wants the safest planes
possible.
  dave