X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [66.94.81.250] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0c1) with HTTP id 675173 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:10:25 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: AOPA Flight Safety Foundation Single Pilot IFR To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0c1 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:10:25 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <17E9FE5945A57A41B4D8C07737DB60721981A1@PDX-MX6.stoel.com> References: <17E9FE5945A57A41B4D8C07737DB60721981A1@PDX-MX6.stoel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Halle, John" : It is certainly possible BUT: Don't fly into no thunderstorms! Airlines regularly loose millions sitting on the ground (and annoy their passengers) to avoid it. I flew F-9s in the Navy. You couldn't hurt them with a sledgehammer but we once waited three days in Pensacola (trying to get to Texas) because of thunderstorms. Maneuvering speed is simply a theoretical speed at which full elevator deflection will not stress the airplane past its published g limits. Slowing to that speed might help but offers absolutely no assurance of continued structural integrity, to say nothing of the fact that maintaining an airspeed, or any other flight paramater, in a thunderstorm is an iffy proposition. We have been flying for over 100 years and, where thunderstorms are concerned, the only way to deal with them is the same as it was when the Wright brothers launched: Don't fly into them. Ever. It may be technologically challenged but at least it is easy to understand.