Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:48:32 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-671235@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.235.199.201; envelope-from=steve@oasissolutions.com
Reply-To: <steve@oasissolutions.com>
From: "Steve Richard" <steve@oasissolutions.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Chelton or Grand Rapids
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <list-670863@logan.com>
Importance: Normal

Just another data point:

I sent my EIS back for a problem that I may have caused.  The day they
received it, they tested it, put in some new parts and sent it back.  They
have the best customer service of any aviation supplier I have dealt with.

....now their manual is another story.

Steve Richard


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of
CRAIG GAINZA
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:58 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Chelton or Grand Rapids


David,

The side by side Chelton installation on my panel has worked well.
Visibilty has not been a problem.   I installed a screen switching mechanism
on my Infinity grip and have been very pleased.

The Chelton system is great and the support is great.  Kirk Hammersmith and
Peter Stiles do a superb job.

GRT's support has been very poor.  I have been waiting close to a year to
have my EAU (GRT makes it for Chelton) fixed.  Greg Toman is a nice guy but
a one man operation.  At Sun n' fun, Greg promised to have my EAU repaired
"long before Oshkosh."

Still waiting...

Craig


>I am building a Legacy and trying to decide to go with Chelton or Grand
>Rapids.  The Grand Rapids is 15k less.  It's also less functional and
>less robust and less proven.


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/