X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [66.94.81.250] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0c1) with HTTP id 670903 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:12:29 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Chelton or Grand Rapids To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0c1 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:12:29 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <002401c5a285$4a5fa760$9505fea9@patk46ttvbmonn> References: <002401c5a285$4a5fa760$9505fea9@patk46ttvbmonn> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for : Just did a comparison of the Chelton and Grand Rapids. I came to the conclusion that they net out about the same price once all the features are balanced and additions to the GR system made to bring it up to the Chelton equivalent. GR may be a grand or so less. GR's is making changes to implement the synthetic terrain and options already on the Chelton and looks like a great unit. I went with the Chelton as it is a proven quantity and certified. The sport is not much different than the certified system. Chelton is selling the unit with a TruTrack Digiflight II autopilot included for $25,900. Two screens and a single AHRS. The Chelton system has an internal GPS (12 Channel) WAAS capable. The GR's system does not have the GPS and does not rely on GPS inputs for its references as Chelton does. The say the least, it is confusing and like you I hope I have made the correct choice. Hope this helps. Pat Brunner