X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:57:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.174.36] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 670801 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:12:14 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.174.36; envelope-from=cgainza@msn.com Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:11:27 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.174.202 by by103fd.bay103.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:11:27 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.54.174.202] X-Originating-Email: [cgainza@msn.com] X-Sender: cgainza@msn.com In-Reply-To: From: "CRAIG GAINZA" X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net X-Original-Bcc: Subject: RE: [LML] Chelton or Grand Rapids X-Original-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:11:27 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2005 16:11:27.0739 (UTC) FILETIME=[281AE4B0:01C5A27D] David, The side by side Chelton installation on my panel has worked well. Visibilty has not been a problem. I installed a screen switching mechanism on my Infinity grip and have been very pleased. The Chelton system is great and the support is great. Kirk Hammersmith and Peter Stiles do a superb job. GRT's support has been very poor. I have been waiting close to a year to have my EAU (GRT makes it for Chelton) fixed. Greg Toman is a nice guy but a one man operation. At Sun n' fun, Greg promised to have my EAU repaired "long before Oshkosh." Still waiting... Craig >I am building a Legacy and trying to decide to go with Chelton or Grand >Rapids. The Grand Rapids is 15k less. It's also less functional and >less robust and less proven.