X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:49:23 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTPS id 1009914 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:21:18 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: (qmail 24865 invoked by uid 2520); 22 Jun 2005 08:20:32 -0500 Received: from 216.107.97.170 by secure5.liveoakhosting.com (envelope-from , uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.84/921. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(216.107.97.170):. Processed in 0.054789 secs); 22 Jun 2005 13:20:32 -0000 Received: from 216-107-97-170.wan.networktel.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (216.107.97.170) by secure5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2005 08:20:32 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: <00439793a7ed7e36320dea0e73d57234@advancedpilot.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Induction air filter X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:20:30 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Hamid: "Lets see if this works" must be backed up with some sound engineering decisions -- assuming that someone else must have done the analysis otherwise they would not have done what they did is not part of sound decisionmaking. You're right. There is one remaining gotcha. We have found that good analysis based on sound engineering principles sometimes is in error and only the testing DATA confirms that you didn't make a little mistake and reconfirm the "law of unintended consequences." When that happens, it's always a "DAMN, Elwood, it shouldn'ta oughta had done THAT?" situation. I hate when those happen. Walter