X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:30:39 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTPS id 1009131 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:01:25 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: (qmail 25687 invoked by uid 2520); 21 Jun 2005 13:00:39 -0500 Received: from 216.107.97.170 by secure5.liveoakhosting.com (envelope-from , uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.84/921. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(216.107.97.170):. Processed in 0.07558 secs); 21 Jun 2005 18:00:39 -0000 Received: from 216-107-97-170.wan.networktel.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (216.107.97.170) by secure5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2005 13:00:39 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-14--664282916 X-Original-Message-Id: <86dbf7c51662063c2c9d70502b9cb50b@advancedpilot.com> From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Induction air filter X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:00:37 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) --Apple-Mail-14--664282916 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I agree 100%. My comments were intended to spark thought about what we=20= do in *experimental* situations that can have unintended consequences. =20= It was not intended to suggest that anyone is WRONG. There are two=20 ways to accomplish that knowledge. Rigorous testing and "let's see if=20= this works." Both carry risks to the equipment. One carries less risk=20= to the flesh and blood. Walter On Jun 21, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 6/21/2005 10:28:14 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 marv@lancaironline.net writes: > I had no idea I was opening such a can of worms with my original post.=20= > Back > to lurk mode. John, =A0 Don't do that! =A0 Some of us have built experimental airplanes to experiment.=A0 Your = input=20 and those of any other closet lurkers that occasionally open the door=20 and let some light out=A0are quite welcome here.=A0 Stuff that works = counts=20 heavily.=A0 Every can of worms contains "de bait" (debate for those of=20= you in Rio Linda). =A0 Grayhawk =A0 =A0= --Apple-Mail-14--664282916 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 I agree 100%. My comments were intended to spark thought about what we do in *experimental* situations that can have unintended consequences. It was not intended to suggest that anyone is WRONG. =20 There are two ways to accomplish that knowledge. Rigorous testing and "let's see if this works." Both carry risks to the equipment. One carries less risk to the flesh and blood. Walter On Jun 21, 2005, at 10:48 AM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: ArialIn a message dated 6/21/2005 10:28:14 A.M. Central Standard Time, marv@lancaironline.net = writes: ArialI had no idea I was opening such a can of worms with my original post. = Back Arialto lurk = mode. = ArialJohn, Arial=A0 ArialDon't do = that! Arial=A0 ArialSome of us have built experimental airplanes to experiment.=A0 Your input and those of any other closet lurkers that occasionally open the door and let some light out=A0are quite welcome here.=A0 Stuff that works counts heavily.=A0= Every can of worms contains "de bait" (debate for those of you in Rio Linda). Arial=A0 ArialGrayhawk Arial=A0 Arial=A0= --Apple-Mail-14--664282916--