X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [70.8.200.177] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c5) with HTTP id 946501 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 May 2005 19:24:36 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Crash Safety To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c5 Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 19:24:36 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050516142716.74E67164039@ws1-4.us4.outblaze.com> References: <20050516142716.74E67164039@ws1-4.us4.outblaze.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Ron Galbraith" : Brent or others, What do you think the easiest way to encapsulate the fuel system in the cabin would be? I like this approach. I also think a fuel shut off valve at the wing would be something to consider too. Are there any remote shutoff valves that we could manually turn off at the wing root where the fuel comes out of the wing before entering the cabin? This is not a perfect solution, but would at least possibly give you a chance in case of a crash, and keep more fuel from coming in the cabin via broken fuel lines. Jeff, are there any accidents you've seen where this might have saved the occupants? Probably hard to tell when the fire burns the entire airplane. Ron Galbraith LNCE N5ES