X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:34:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [209.218.83.70] (HELO utahweb.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 945237 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 15 May 2005 20:31:40 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.218.83.70; envelope-from=clkeller@utahweb.com Received: from utahweb.com [67.106.48.74] by utahweb.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.15) id ABD212200280; Sun, 15 May 2005 18:39:46 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <4287E9DA.8070107@utahweb.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 18:31:22 -0600 From: C & A Keller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mail List Subject: CHT Probe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Declude-Sender: clkeller@utahweb.com [67.106.48.74] X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted [0] When trying to install the bayonet type CHT probes on my IO-360 (actually an XP-360, but the same thing) I found the probe installed in #1 cylinder has a serious interference with the Lancair type EX-5 exhaust. Lots of you LNC2 people must have run into this problem. How did you resolve it? I suppose I could use a gasket thermocouple, but that seems like an unholy mix of apples and oranges. Would its temperature reading be consistent with those of the other three bayonet probes? Charles Keller --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Utahweb]