Return-Path: Received: from mail.mc.net ([209.172.128.4]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Wed, 21 Jul 1999 14:31:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 27261 invoked from network); 21 Jul 1999 18:34:47 -0000 Received: from mchenry2-62.mc.net (HELO mc.net) (209.172.136.254) by mail.mc.net with SMTP; 21 Jul 1999 18:34:47 -0000 Message-ID: <3796140A.E1825531@mc.net> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:40:10 -0500 From: jerry@mc.net Reply-To: jerry@mc.net To: TheWireGuy@aol.com, lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: Master relay References: <1aaeb59d.24c760f8@aol.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To everyone with the knowledge/experience Wouldn't it be good to install "continuous duty" rated relays for all applications where a relay is required for heavy loads? The cost couldn't be that much different and the over heat and "welded" threat would seem to be reduced. Comments please. Jerry Grimmonpre' L320 McHenry, IL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html