Message-ID: <3795E551.5C18B1D5@mc.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 10:20:49 -0500
From: jerry@mc.net
Reply-To: jerry@mc.net
To: Lancair Mail List <lancair.list@olsusa.com>, Sky2high@aol.com
Subject: Re: EAA
References: <1421f4d9.24c6a5fd@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
To:  Scott Krueger  N92EX and all the LML builders

Well stated Scott I think you have it right on.

My 2 cents worth.
Keep the LML apart from being an EAA chapter.  We provide more to each
other's needs than even we realize.  All the paperwork involved with
being an EAA chapter is not going to result in greater information
flow.  Especially  on how to stiffen an aileron to prevent flutter or
how to rectify an elevator/stab/controls to relieve the back pressure
when flaps are deployed.  What would the EAA recommend in the present
heavy control problem when flaps are deployed?  Would their
recommendation be better if we were a Chapter?  Would it be more or
less than what Lancair has offered for a solution to this problem?
The basic question is how would we be better off as LML subscribers?
I would be willing to hear those answers.

I feel when the LML is discovered by EAA they will be glad to keep us
separate from them so they can refer members to the LML at little cost
to the EAA.  We are the EAA when it comes to building Lancairs.  We
will be better off keeping ourselves independent and free.  We are the
leaders with Lancair building and becoming stronger.  If it ain't
broke don't fix it.

Jerry Grimmonpre'     L320    McHenry, IL


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML homepage:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html