Return-Path: Received: from hpamgaab.compuserve.com ([149.174.217.153]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:18:21 -0400 Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by hpamgaab.compuserve.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/HP-1.5) id JAA00104 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:21:10 -0400 From: Lynda Frantz Subject: Tuffed wings and high elevator forces Sender: Lynda Frantz To: "INTERNET:lancair.list@olsusa.com" Message-ID: <199907190921_MC2-7D7A-DB9F@compuserve.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Have a request for Naf while your wings are tuffed: Could you take a few pictures of the tuffed wing as you approach a stall. Would like to see how the stall developes along the wing as the AOA approaches critical. Will publish the pictures in the Lancair Network News if available. If you could indicate picture A at xxx IAS, picture B at xxx IAS etc. I assume that you reduced the elevator moment arm to increase the mechanical advantage at the stick. Much has been written about this in the LNN. I talk with lots of folks and find that the MII electric trim tab system is slightly inadequate because it will not provide hands off trim from high speed cruise to approach speeds over the entire range of CGs. I suspect this is because the trim tab volume is not quite large enough. The factory centering spring trim system also is not quite strong enough but there has been many fixes using geared trim systems, shorter elevator bell cranks and stronger centering springs. Again these fixes have been widely published in the LNN. Thanks, Jim Frantz (612) 474-4154 Jim@Lancair.net >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html