Return-Path: Received: from lanfear.nidlink.com ([216.18.128.7]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 10:49:51 -0400 Received: from enaila.nidlink.com (root@enaila.nidlink.com [216.18.128.8]) by lanfear.nidlink.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id HAA20273 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from regandesigns.com (tnt132-198.nidlink.com [216.18.132.198]) by enaila.nidlink.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id HAA05065 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3790989F.8B62A69E@regandesigns.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:52:15 -0700 From: Brent Regan To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: LML as EAA chapter References: <19990717044925.AAA1429@truman.olsusa.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> After considering the ramifications of adopting an EAA club charter I am unable to see a clear advantage to the participants here. Consider these points: This list was formed to promote the free exchange of information among Lancair builders. Thanks to Marv's parenting skills, this goal is achieved remarkable well. Most list members are already EAA members. An EAA club charter will involve additional administrative work, the election of officers, filing of reports, etc.. all of which will take time away from building/flying and introduce politicks to the mix. If I had to give up one membership (LML or EAA) I would give up EAA as the LML is more valuable to me. I see no reason to make the LML a subset of the EAA. Perhaps the EAA would like to become a chapter of the LML ;) If it works (especially if it works well), DON'T F**K WITH IT !!! Respectfully Brent Regan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html