Return-Path: Received: from web601.yahoomail.com ([128.11.68.202]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 01:03:10 -0400 Received: from [207.175.225.205] by web2002.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 22:06:08 PDT Message-ID: <19990714050608.19710.rocketmail@web601.yahoomail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 22:06:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Denis Conkey Subject: Fuel Flow on Don George IO-320 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >I have a few hours on my LNC2 now. The engine is a Don George overhaul, IO-320 with 9:1 compression. It seems to be running rich. (It runs rougher and has a higher mag drop at full rich, 80 feet ASL.) Can anyone with a similar engine tell me what your fuel flow is, both full rich and leaned for cruise, at a range of pressure altitudes at, say, 24 squared, or something obtainable at higher altitudes? Bob N4YH< Bob, Our Lancair 235 has a Don George IO-320, same 9.0 pistons, the cylinders have been ported and flowed, and one electronic ignition. The fuel injection system is by Air Flow Performance. At first we were running lean, buring around 13.5-13.8 gph on takeoff. With a new fuel injection jet we are now getting about 14.5 gph on takeoff, which seems to be more normal from what I've discovered. The fuel flow at altitude is about 9.5 gph at 8.5K and 8.2 gph at 10.5K density altitudes. Obviously this is very dependent on your leaning technique. I run about 75 to 100 degrees rich of lean. May burn a bit more fuel, but get a bit more power and seems to run very well there without fouling the plugs. We have about 170 hours on the engine now. Hope this helps. Denis Conkey N235WC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html