Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.227] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c2)
  with HTTP id 793592 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:57:54 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: supershargers
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c2
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:57:54 -0500
Message-ID: <web-793592@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E3B5445@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
References: <E8D9A32F94C65B4AB6D8F4730E38460E3B5445@sdf1.mail.taturbo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "George Braly" <gwbraly@gami.com>:

  Rick,
  
  This is not a question of who sells what.
  
  It is a question of the physics.
  
  The fundamental problem with  superchargers   whose speed is a multiple of
the speed of the crank shaft is - --  the speed is a fixed multiple of the
crank shaft when it VERY VERY much needs to be a variable speed, not fixed.
  
  That fundamental limitation is what defines the source of the inefficiencies
with fixed ration superchargers - - belt driven,  gear driven, or otherwise.
  
  Regards,  George