Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:36:18 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-791250@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <glcasey@adelphia.net>
Received: from mta13.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.44] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 791216 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:37:02 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.44; envelope-from=glcasey@adelphia.net
Received: from worldwinds ([70.32.213.236]) by mta13.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP
          id <20050313133617.LRMY4618.mta13.adelphia.net@worldwinds>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:36:17 -0500
From: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE:  Electronic Ignition
X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 05:31:31 -0800
X-Original-Message-ID: <NEBBIBKBKLGPNKKOGMMBAECLGCAB.glcasey@adelphia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <list-791132@logan.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

<<The decreased fuel flow in cruise will cover their cost in about 300
hrs.>>

I would certainly like to see real data on this, for both single electronic
and dual electronic systems.  How much BSFC improvement is there to be had
by advancing only one of the sparks?  Both of the sparks?  I'm thinking of
manifold pressures of 20 inches or lower.  Has anyone done a real dyno test
to get this data?  How about a timing sweep under these conditions?

Gary Casey