Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:35:58 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta13.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.44] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 791218 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:36:52 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.44; envelope-from=glcasey@adelphia.net Received: from worldwinds ([70.32.213.236]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050313133607.LRJN4618.mta13.adelphia.net@worldwinds> for ; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:36:07 -0500 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: Re: Vacuum supply for backup gyros X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 05:31:30 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 <> I like this idea, and I once designed a "modern" configuration that had a heated inlet lip to prevent icing and was highly streamlined for minimum drag. This is an external component to build and will add a certain amount of drag. The vacuum is not available on the ground so one has to have faith that the backup gyros will spin up shortly after takeoff. Unfortunately some electrical failures happen then as well. One could design the venturi into existing drag-producing shapes, such as gear leg fairings, etc. Existing low pressure areas don't generate the required vacuum without adding something - like a secondary venturi. The good thing about an external venturi is that it doesn't rely on the engine in any way. It does require a pressure regulator if accurate gyro indications are expected at all airspeeds. Gary Casey