Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.163.227] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c2) with HTTP id 790888 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:44:39 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Vacuum supply for backup gyros To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c2 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:44:39 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <00bc01c52733$ecded8d0$db5d70d1@DJS6ZV41> References: <00bc01c52733$ecded8d0$db5d70d1@DJS6ZV41> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Jerry Grimmonpre" : Gary ... Obviously you are on to something and the backup vac AI is what I would like for my glass cockpit. The vac pump has demonstrated it's unreliability. It would be nice to have a reliable source of vac to drive only one instrument ... the AI. Since I am not using a turbo charged engine there is a need for another vac source that has no periodic cost, no moving parts, reliable and not sticking out into the wind. Is there a way to use the 4" venturi to dirve one AI and not have it sticking out into the slipstream as with the early venturis? The 4" is $50 at Aircraft Spruce P/N 15050. Just a thought for those with experience with venturis. Can venturis be made to work in an tunnel of high velocity air? Regards ... Jerry Grimmonpre > I'm thinking that at least some turbocharged engine users would like to > use > non-electric (vacuum) gyros as a backup for their fancy glass panels. I > have a design (patented, in fact) that allows a turbocharged engine to > supply the required differential pressure to vacuum instruments under all > operating conditions without the necessity of a vacuum pump. This could