Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.163.227] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c2) with HTTP id 780063 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:09:44 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Baja! To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c2 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:09:44 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4231FA74.3040408@ieee.org> References: <4231FA74.3040408@ieee.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Charles R. Patton" : Oh yeah, a couple of other points I forgot. Part of the fee is based on airplane wingspan, so our Lancair 360 was the minimum. A IV would probably be more. The other point -- bring passports or good photo ID(?). They were used for the visa they gave us on landing. There is a program where you can pay a bit more, but then you can enter multiple times per year. One thing necessary for it is to have 3 (three) copies of everything when you enter, then you can get a mulitple entry permit. You'll still pay some fees, but others become cheaper. I don't have the notes on all this right now, but if there is interest I can dig them up. All in all, our experience was fine, and we will be doing it again, but I know several members of a social flying club we belong to won't fly in MX anymore due to various bad experiences. So it may have a lot to do with where you choose to go. Charles Patton LNC2 N360JM > We were just down to Alamos, MX in late January, and they weren't > bothered at > all by the fact that is experimental, We flew into Cuidad Obregon for > a port > of entry. They just wanted the papers; registration, proof of Mexican > insurance, and pilot's license, and proof you're allowed to fly the > plane -- > i.e., if the plane is registered to a corporation, then you need to > have the > corporation's permission to fly the plane. Fees totaled just under > $100 US. > Charles Patton LNC2 N360JM