Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:18:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from www.dynacomm.ws ([198.22.63.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 750420 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:50:44 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=198.22.63.66; envelope-from=lorn@dynacomm.ws Received: from smtp.StdDtaSys.com (adsl-69-209-178-105.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net [69.209.178.105]) by [198.22.63.109] (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j1JHntP11956 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:49:55 -0500 Received: from lorn.StdDtaSys.com [10.0.1.202] by pop.StdDtaSys.com (AppleMailServer 10.2.3.0) id 49387 via TCP with SMTP; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:49:51 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Cc: Gary Casey From: "Lorn H. Olsen" Subject: RE: Air intake formula X-Original-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:49:50 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) >> Following is an article that I wrote last year. I have also included >> an >> Excel spreadsheet where you can plug in your own engine size and scoop >> diameter. Lorn H. Olsen > > Lorn, > The calculations you presented appear to recommend the inlet to be > sized for > a 1:1 velocity ratio - in other words the velocity in the inlet is > equal to > the free airstream velocity. I see other recommendations that are for > velocity ratios between 0.4 and 0.7, producing much of the pressure > recovery > ahead of the inlet. The advantage of that, as I see it, is that > pressure > recovery ahead of the inlet is quite efficient and requires less > recovery > inside the duct, reducing the required length. Also, at lower > airspeeds the > inlet is more efficient as there is less chance for flow separation > inside > the duct. What do you think? > > Gary Casey Gary, My calculations only have to do with the straight forward mathematics used to calculate the diameter of the scoop. I make an assumption that there is no air compression and no air friction. In order to calculate the most optimum size of the scoop when both air compression and friction are considered, the equations become much more complex. I think, so complex in fact, that wind tunnels should be used. I have neither a wind tunnel nor the thermodynamic engineering background to do these more advanced studies (calculations). My spreadsheet does not recommend a specific scoop diameter (velocity ratio). The spreadsheet simply shows, based upon the scoop diameter, the extra percentage of air that you, the builder, have chosen to incorporate into your design. -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, Corp. 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws LNC2, O-320-D1F, 1,000 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan