Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.242] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c1)
  with HTTP id 744913 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:48:55 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: LNC2 cowl inlet size
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c1
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:48:55 -0500
Message-ID: <web-744913@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <001201c51603$6ec081b0$0301010a@CRAIN>
References: <001201c51603$6ec081b0$0301010a@CRAIN>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Dominic V. Crain" <domcrain@pacific.net.au>:

  
  Interested to have input from the list on cowl inlet sizes, and if
  anyone has increased the diameter, and how that has affected the CHT
  cooling.
  My O-320 has the prop control located inside the left cowl intake, and
  it seems to me that it affects the intake flow by a large percentage.
For example, cyl 2 CHT, given its location relative to airflow, is the
  hottest cylinder.
  Photos of any cowl remodelling would be appreciated.
  Dom Crain