Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.162.219] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.8)
  with HTTP id 651661 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:47:34 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: static wicks
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.8
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:47:34 -0500
Message-ID: <web-651661@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1CvPEt-0006aS-00@relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au>
References: <E1CvPEt-0006aS-00@relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Gerard O Connell" <goconnell@dodo.com.au>:

  On the same subject, where are they best mounted?
  
  --
  Gerard O Connell
  Melbourne, Australia
  VH-LPD (LNC2)


[Bill also has that data from the people who manufacture the wicks.  I believe 
the 320 airframe only requires 10, not the 15 like on the IV.  2 on each 
aileron, 2 on each elevator half, and 2 on the rudder.  I could be mistaken on 
this, though, so check with him.   <Marv>        ]