Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.162.219] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.8) with HTTP id 651584 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:19:54 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Good job, Lancair To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.8 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:19:54 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050130215650.19750.qmail@web40523.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050130215650.19750.qmail@web40523.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Art Jensen : Were these design changes copies of suggestions submitted on the LML previously by builders/owners? Is Lancairs design change different/better than previous suggestions? Did Lancair notify builders/owners that a design change has been made and is available and I just missed the notice or did they not send out a notice? I for one would be interested in any changes that are improvements for up-coming concerns. If they failed to notify builders/owners, I would hope that is something they intend to correct. Maybe they are planning to send out notices in the next few weeks or so. I do believe that it is good customer service for Lancair to send out notices of changes or revisions. Customers should not have to hear third hand. Art Jensen --- Leighton wrote: > In early January John Halle reported in the LML > about a problem we discovered with the rudder > bellcranks on his and Carl Lewis' Legacys and > Lancair was contacted about the problem. About a