Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:28:46 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-626366@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=165.166.0.28; envelope-from=tkhall@highland.net
From: Tom Hall <tkhall@highland.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: wxworx vs. wsi - the companies
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; reply-type=response; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <list-625949@logan.com>

While I use and prefer the WxWorx product, Both WxWorx  (Baron Services) and 
WSI are substantial companies with vast weather distribution resources. It 
would appear that Wxworx is gaining a broad market following. I'm sure that 
both companies will likely be around for the foreseeable future. My guess is 
that there is "room" for both in the aviation wx distribution business. 
Either product is a great asset for our aircraft. Once you have it, it 
becomes a necessity.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 1:11 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: wxworx vs. wsi - the companies


> Posted for "colyncase on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>:
>
>  An earlier post says that lag time is very similar and is determined
> more by government radar facilities and their information release times 
> than
> by the service.
>  However, the point of this thread was which company has more staying 
> power in
> the long run?
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/
>