Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.162.219] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.8) with HTTP id 623714 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:48:09 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: NACA64212 Airfoil To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.8 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:48:09 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <001001c503d3$31215ce0$6401a8c0@YOURG4LZVXOU0C> References: <001001c503d3$31215ce0$6401a8c0@YOURG4LZVXOU0C> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Martin Hollmann" : Dear Mr. Kaye, I have just read the letter posted on your website: Alert. NACA64212. I and Rick McWilliams designed the Lancair IV wing and here is my response. Yes, the NACA64212 has a sharp stall. However, the wing is designed with the RXM5-217 airfoil, a very gentle stalling airfoil, at the root and the NACA64212 airfoil at the tip. The wing is washed out so that the root stalls first. The wing tip is not designed to stall and as such the question of how it stalls is not relevant. The NACA64212 airfoil was chosen for the tip because it has a high lift coefficient and it is very effective with an aileron. I use this wing design on my Stallion and both the Stallion and the Lancair IV have a very gentle stall. While Rick McWilliams and I designed the wing of the Lancair IV, I also designed structure for the wing of the Rigel AA300, a two place jet trainer. The wing airfoils for that airplane had been selected by Harry Riblett. When I superimposed the root airfoil and tip airfoil of both wings, the airfoils were almost identical. I really felt good since I know that Riblett uses the Eppler code and McWilliams used the Oshkosh Airfoil Program and neither of these two people talk to each other. Both had come up with the same wing airfoil design. I felt great. Then something happened that really turned my stomach. Shortly after the Lancair IV flew, Harry Riblett sent a letter to my good friend Paul Poberezny (EAA), all major airframe manufactures, NASA directors stating that the Lancair IV had the wrong airfoils and wing design. [...snip...] Needless to say, I realized that Riblett was not only suffering from the NIH (not invented here) syndrome and visions of grandeur, [...snip...]. I hope that this clears things up and if you have any questions, call me at 831-649-6212. Martin Hollmann