Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:31:33 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m22.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.3] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 622811 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:24:18 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.3; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.143.3dbe0283 (17377) for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:23:45 -0500 (EST) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <143.3dbe0283.2f28f3e1@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:23:45 EST Subject: Re: [LML] IV-P Carbon vs Glass X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1106745825" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5000 -------------------------------1106745825 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I know that some guys have gone with carbon because it is so much easier to work with. It lays down so much easier and wets out with little effort. You get spoiled really quickly and don't want to deal with the glass cloth! Mike Easley -------------------------------1106745825 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I know that some guys have gone with carbon because it is so much easie= r to=20 work with. It lays down so much easier and wets out with little=20 effort. You get spoiled really quickly and don't want to deal with the= =20 glass cloth!

Mike Easley

-------------------------------1106745825--