Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:53:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 622426 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:14:33 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.37; envelope-from=WarbirdAeroPress@cox.net Received: from DELL ([68.98.122.127]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20050126041359.NDUN17983.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@DELL> for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:13:59 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <000d01c5035d$71f990f0$6401a8c0@DELL> From: "Scotty G" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair Stalls X-Original-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:13:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C50322.C563CA70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C50322.C563CA70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeff, I'm the new guy around here, and I certainly don't know everything - or = even as much as most of the other folks here. But I want to give you my = two cents. You can ABSOLUTELY fly a Lancair safely and to an exacting = standard. Even as a low time pilot. Period. I would suggest a *complete* checkout by somebody like Dave Morss (and = there are others that you would be in good hands with). While my = training was adaquate, my education in flying my Lancair 360 since then = has been steep. Just to give you some idea of scope, I have over 9,000 = hours in 89 different types of aircraft, but I am no superman. I respect = the aircraft's wing loading, glide performance (manhole cover) and = handling. There are areas of the flight envelope, and cg envelope, you just don't = mess around in. Having said all of that, please do go fly a Lancair Legacy or 360. If = you are ever in Phoenix, I'd be more than happy to take you flying. You = will truly enjoy and appreciate the airplane and its performance. Scotty G www.DagoRed-AirRacing.com www.UnleashedAirRacing.com www.WarbirdAeroPress.com WarbirdAeroPress.com All mail is scanned for viruses. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C50322.C563CA70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jeff,
 
I'm the new guy around here, and I certainly don't = know=20 everything - or even as much as most of the other folks here. But I want = to give=20 you my two cents. You can ABSOLUTELY fly a Lancair safely and to an = exacting=20 standard. Even as a low time pilot. Period.
 
I would suggest a *complete* checkout by somebody = like Dave=20 Morss (and there are others that you would be in good hands with). While = my=20 training was adaquate, my education in flying my Lancair 360 since then = has been=20 steep. Just to give you some idea of scope, I have over 9,000 hours in = 89=20 different types of aircraft, but I am no superman. I respect the = aircraft's wing=20 loading, glide performance (manhole cover) and = handling.
 
There are areas of the flight envelope, and cg = envelope, you=20 just don't mess around in.
 
Having said all of that, please do go fly a Lancair = Legacy or=20 360. If you are ever in Phoenix, I'd be more than happy to take you = flying. You=20 will truly enjoy and appreciate the airplane and its=20 performance.

Scotty G
www.DagoRed-AirRacing.comwww.UnleashedAirRacing.com=
www.WarbirdAeroPress.com
= WarbirdAeroPress.com
 
All mail is scanned for viruses.
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C50322.C563CA70--