Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:33:24 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-621058@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>
Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8)
  with ESMTP id 621043 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:20:30 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu
Received: from HP780N (cpe-065-184-086-088.nc.rr.com [65.184.86.88])
	by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j0PFJt4S014698
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:19:56 -0500 (EST)
From: "Matt Hapgood" <hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Dynon Gyro Horizon
X-Original-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:20:05 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <MMEELOPNFCJLIMPNNKMOIEJMDIAA.hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-620999@logan.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine

If it were me, I would replace the Gyro Horizon with a Midcontinent electric
gyro unit (with internal battery backup) and replace the DG with a Sandel
unit with remote gyro and flux gate.

Then you would have 100% certified equipment and a lot less fear of
electrical gremlins invading critical equipment.  You would have a ton of
information that the Dynon doesn't provide.  The reality is that your panel
already provides virtually failure proof airspeed and altimeter info.

Now you can ditch the vacuum pump completely and feel darn good about your
flying.

Just my $0.02.

Matt

__
As usual any and all comments are welcomed.
--