Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:29:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 576229 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:49:23 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.2; envelope-from=Tubamanflies@aol.com Received: from Tubamanflies@aol.com by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.45.1e093030 (16335) for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:48:47 -0500 (EST) From: Tubamanflies@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <45.1e093030.2efa489f@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:48:47 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Remove lower cowl for prop balancing? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_45.1e093030.2efa489f_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6811 --part1_45.1e093030.2efa489f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I did mine with only the upper cowl removed. I had no problems. The lower cowl is attached with hindges and pins along the rear. Ray Gardner LNC2 @ CWF In a message dated 12/21/04 9:18:16 PM Central Standard Time, rbelshe@comcast.net writes: > I'm planning to have my prop dynamically balanced next month. > > I'm worrying about whether to remove the lower cowl also, considering that > the prop blast might do it damage without the support of the upper cowl. > > Maybe I worry too much, what have others done? > > Bob Belshe > L235/320 > --part1_45.1e093030.2efa489f_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I did mine with only the upper cowl= removed.  I had no problems.  The lower cowl is attached with hin= dges and pins along the rear.

Ray Gardner
LNC2 @ CWF

In a message dated 12/21/04 9:18:16 PM Central Standard Time, rbelshe@comcas= t.net writes:

I'm planning to have my prop= dynamically balanced next month. 

I'm worrying about whether to remove the lower cowl also, considering tha= t the prop blast might do it damage without the support of the upper cowl.
 
Maybe I worry too much,  what have others done?
 
Bob Belshe
L235/320


 --part1_45.1e093030.2efa489f_boundary--