Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:17:34 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([204.127.202.56] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 576098 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:46:10 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.56; envelope-from=rbelshe@comcast.net Received: from desk (c-67-174-213-89.client.comcast.net[67.174.213.89]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20041222014541012007rcqde>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 01:45:41 +0000 From: "Bob B." X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Remove lower cowl for prop balancing? X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:46:45 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003D_01C4E785.0A642B60" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcTnCiwsgjXb4+x9RIq+WN+27rmY/QAvVbew X-Original-Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C4E785.0A642B60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm planning to have my prop dynamically balanced next month. I'm worrying about whether to remove the lower cowl also, considering that the prop blast might do it damage without the support of the upper cowl. Maybe I worry too much, what have others done? Bob Belshe L235/320 ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C4E785.0A642B60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm = planning to=20 have my prop dynamically balanced next month. =20

I'm = worrying=20 about whether to remove the lower cowl also, considering that the prop = blast=20 might do it damage without the support of the upper=20 cowl.

Maybe I worry too=20 much, what have others done?

Bob = Belshe

L235/320

------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C4E785.0A642B60--