Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 23:52:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.4) with ESMTP id 457061 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 21:45:51 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.6; envelope-from=Newlan2dl@aol.com Received: from Newlan2dl@aol.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id q.be.182386d0 (4380) for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:45:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Newlan2dl@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:45:16 EDT Subject: Thinking out of the box X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1097199916" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5032 -------------------------------1097199916 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I heartily agree George but given the success of Space Ship one, I want to see the first orbital experimental kit plane! For the Lancair IV, first there was the TSIO 550, then the pressurized version, then the turbine. Can a hypergolic rocket L-IV be far behind? IFR clearance to orbit! OK, enough sillyness, I agree about Lancair taking care of us. There is some serious negativity on the LML at times but I have yet to have a problem. I have much less experience with them than many of you however, but one judge of the character of a company is how the employees like their work. They seem pretty dedicated to Lancair and us so I give the company pretty high marks that way. Dan -------------------------------1097199916 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I heartily agree George but given the success of Space Ship one, I want= to see the first orbital experimental kit plane! For the Lancair IV,=20= first there was the TSIO 550, then the pressurized version, then the turbine= . Can a hypergolic rocket L-IV be far behind? IFR clearance to o= rbit!

OK, enough sillyness, I agree about Lancair taking care of us. Th= ere is some serious negativity on the LML at times but I have yet to have a=20= problem. I have much less experience with them than many of you howeve= r, but one judge of the character of a company is how the employees like the= ir work. They seem pretty dedicated to Lancair and us so I give the co= mpany pretty high marks that way.

Dan

-------------------------------1097199916--