Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.162.45] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.3)
  with HTTP id 438365 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:52:41 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LIVP Flying Above 29,000'...RVSM's Effect?
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.3
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:52:41 -0400
Message-ID: <web-438365@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF8218C584.54C3EA93-ON86256F1F.005EEA9A@faa.gov>
References: <OF8218C584.54C3EA93-ON86256F1F.005EEA9A@faa.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for larry.eversmeyer@faa.gov:
  
  Hi Guys:
  I've talk to one of the domestic RVSM task force member at FAA HDQ and they
  are saying that everything below FL270 in the future will be handled as
  they are today.  Basically it will be first come first served. Discussion
  between the FAA and ATC is they only expect about 15% of the aircraft that
  is flying above FL290 is not RVSM equipped and ATC expects to be able to
  handle this 15% push down.  Sorry for the confusion.
  
  Larry E.
  Legacy 2000 N72LE