Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.162.45] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.3)
  with HTTP id 438057 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:33:19 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LIVP Flying Above 29,000'...RVSM's Effect?
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.3
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:33:19 -0400
Message-ID: <web-438057@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <415C16D9.4050909@ustek.com>
References: <list-437526@logan.com>
 <415C16D9.4050909@ustek.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Robert M. Simon" <lancair@ustek.com>:

  Bill Kennedy wrote:
  
> Hold on to your hats folks. Doesn't it seem like kind of an odd rule? 
> Wonder why AOPA, EAA, etc. have been so quiet. My guess is that there 
> is no such rule. Let's check it out before we cry "The sky is falling, 
> the sky is falling". 
  
  
  I spoke with AOPA in MD today and their airspace guru (who flys his Seneca 
in
the low to mid 20's) has not heard a word about this restriction.  I deleated
the original post and could not tell him the source.  Would someone kindly
send me a copy of the e-mail that started the brouhaha?
  
  Robert M. Simon
  
  
[The original post, as far as I can tell, came from Jeff Liegner and can be 
found in the archives at 
"http://lancaironline.net/lists/lml/Message/25857.html".  I hope this helps. 
    <Marv>         ]