Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.162.45] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.3)
  with HTTP id 437369 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:36:49 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Legacy Wing Panel Failure
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.3
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:36:49 -0400
Message-ID: <web-437369@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <000001c4a64f$63a2fe30$7e664e0c@tfs>
References: <000001c4a64f$63a2fe30$7e664e0c@tfs>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Thomas Williams" <tfsent@worldnet.att.net>:

  If the bonding was that poor on the stub wing, what about the rest of
  the plane???   Scary thought!


""" VTAILJEFF@aol.com wrote:
  
   Now you guys know the rest of the story... don't be too quick to jump
  on the
   factory for failures at home.
   
   Jeff Edwards
   LIVP
   
   > You're correct.  The inboard wing panel was done at home.