Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:01:01 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web51106.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.2) with SMTP id 425402 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:20:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.38.148; envelope-from=peweston@yahoo.com X-Original-Message-ID: <20040922141656.25350.qmail@web51106.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.161.169.220] by web51106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:16:56 PDT X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:16:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Pat Weston Subject: Re: [LML] To stall or not to stall? That is my question. X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In flight testing my ES I stalled it several times, both power on and off. It was well behaved and was easy to recover. A friend of mine who flew off about ten hours in the early testing also stalled it with the same results. I am firmly in the "chicken pilot" category with no airline nor military experience. If you're going to stall it, go high. Pat Weston Super Duper ES (399.8 hours) ===== Pat N747PW Lancair Super Duper ES, Flying! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com