Return-Path: Received: from olympus.net ([198.133.237.1]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 8 Jun 1999 20:06:43 -0400 Received: from ptpm078.olympus.net ([198.133.237.108] helo=2thman) by olympus.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 10rVvy-0004Nn-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Tue, 8 Jun 1999 17:09:34 -0700 Message-ID: <002a01beb20c$8a0cd100$726fdfdf@2thman> From: "John Barrett" <2thman@olympus.net> To: "Lancair Mail List" Subject: Lancair Good Guys Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 17:10:52 -0700 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Dear Marv & Mail List Subscribers, My wife and I flew down to Lancair HQ in my Beech Sierra yesterday to pick up a bulky part I'd purchased for my IVP. My experience was so positive that I have to mention it - especially after the extremely negative comments made about Lancair on the LML a couple of days ago. Vern Pifer assisted by me showing me the part - weighing it for me (it's a carbon fiber overhead console) and then he replaced for no charge a bolt that was missing from the kit I'd ordered 3.5 years ago. He also cheerfully filled orders for a couple other miscelaneous parts. After that, he was gracious enough to provide transport to a nearby restaurant so we could eat, and he connected me up with a new Lancair technical adviser (Mark) to help with a problem I was having with the door latches. I expected to hear the following: "Oh, so how'd you screw this up like this? Well, don't do it that way, just do this, this & this." etc Instead, Mark looked the latches over carefully and discussed with me the details of the mechanism - showing where it was ok to alter the brackets if they don't travel smoothly, etc. Then he took me into the machine shop and assisted me for about an hour making sure the problems I had were solved. Bottom line - Lancair is a great company to work with. The kits are about the best you can find - from design to fabrication; A to Z. Are they perfect? Of course not! Are there things I wish they'd made differently? Of course. Have I made changes to the design? Dozens - I hope the percentage of good ones comes close to those in the original. Isn't this why they call it Experimental? Is Lancair attentive to complaints and are they improving the kits? You bet! I walked through the factory and looked at the new fast build IV kits. I'm amazed at how complete and well built they are. But you can bet that Lancair isn't going to respond to every suggestion or complaint I make - not even if I did have some credentials to back me up. Think of the balls these folks have to keep in the air full time - new designs, marketing, tech support, improvement of techniques, manuals, etc etc etc. This is what the LNN - LML, Fastpackets and Forums are for. We get to improve an incredibly wonderful airplane to make it even better. If there was one thing I'd ask it's that Lancair be a little more forthcoming about the information they put out when things go wrong. Case in point: One Lancair service bulletin discussed cracked windows in the cabin door. What they never said was that the entire window took a powder and left the airplane. In my mind, this could mean the difference from your radio transmission going up half an octive to two or three octives - a considerably greater pucker factor. I think builders might tend to take the SB in a more serious vein if they got the story unadorned. I'm sure it's tough when you're the marketer and the safety captain all at once to wear both shoes evenly. But other than this one minor suggestion, I can't think of much to say to Lancair other than "Keep up the Great Work" Regards, John Barrett >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html