Return-Path: Received: from mail.eclipse.net ([207.207.192.13]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:10:23 -0400 Received: from bltinc.com (nyc1-03-152.eclipse.net [207.207.226.152]) by mail.eclipse.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA14193 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 1999 11:13:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <375D322E.97D1D161@bltinc.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 11:09:35 -0400 From: Ed McCauley Organization: Bottom Line Technologies Inc. To: "lancair.list@olsusa.com" Subject: Pressurization time requirement for Insurance? X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I was speaking with a P337 guy at the airport yesterday and he mentioned that insurance companies do/may require folks to have "pressurized time", similar to retract time. Any truth to this? On a similar subject, what's the current forecast of requirements these days? Total time, retract ect. I've heard, read in the Lancair Mail, and agree with, the requirement for factory training and inspection. I've also heard that a lancair approved engine and fuel system will be a requirement. While I understand the powerplant position (and my common sense agrees with it) I see the potential for it to severely limit the 'mission' of the amateur built experimental category. Any thoughts? Ed McCauley Lancair IVP (12.486+/-15% complete) Milford, NJ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML homepage: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html