Return-Path: Received: from [161.88.255.139] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2) with HTTP id 361306 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:12:16 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] WiFi In Your Airplane To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:12:16 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040811124515.SM01512@dap> References: <20040811124515.SM01512@dap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Don Parsons" : At first I read the article, and was highly skeptical about a 35 mile WiFi connection. In earlier years, I did not believe that the Defcon Wi-fi Shootout contestants had been able to establish WiFi connections over such great distances. The whole point of the contest is to see who can establish the most distant WiFi connection. I see from the article below that they have been able to get greater distances than Cringley's 35 miles. So... apparently it is possible, and therefore it does have some interesting implications for getting Internet access while in flight. http://www.bbwexchange.com/publications/newswires/page546-1086045.asp Sure would let war drivers cover a whole lot more ground in a given amount of time. ;-) 802.11b and 802.11g use 2.4 GHz frequencies. Is there anything that we might have in our panels that WiFi might interfere with? From what I gather from the Cringely article, the answer is no. Don