Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 22:44:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.233.170.192] (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 352505 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 19:42:25 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.170.192; envelope-from=dane.jasper@gmail.com Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 78so357725rnl for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.79.37 with SMTP id c37mr167566rnb; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:41:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <6dfe4dec0408041641387ac44@mail.gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:41:55 -0700 From: Dane Jasper Reply-To: dane@sonic.net X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Thoughts on BRS parachute system Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm currently flying a Cirrus, and thinking of building a Lancair. I am curious to hear from current Lancair owners and builders what their thoughts are about a Balistic Recovery System parachute option. I certainly feel more comfortable having one on board today in my Cirrus, and I'd be very excited about building a Lancair that included one. What do other participants in the list think about the idea? I've asked Lancair, and they say that they're talking about this, but have no firm timeline. -Dane