Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:04:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [63.243.61.82] (HELO ntfs15.AMAGlobal.dom) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b7) with ESMTP id 251189 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 17:59:06 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C46534.F9FA6680" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: W&B X-Original-Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:46:07 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: W&B Thread-Index: AcRlNPoUfoDz6U/NSKOrFreYT0DlMw== From: "Henry Perry" X-Original-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C46534.F9FA6680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I keep hearing that the CG limits on the L4P are incorrect because they are for the gear down configuration only. Any plane loaded near the aft CG would then be out of limits as the weight of the gear [50 lb estimates] moves back under the baggage compartment. Also that Charlie Kohler has a better way to calculate the CG envelope. Is any of this true? Seems nuts to create the envelope in gear down config? Any one know the truth? Tx Hap Perry ------_=_NextPart_001_01C46534.F9FA6680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable W&B

I keep hearing that the CG limits on = the L4P are incorrect because they are for the gear down configuration = only. Any plane loaded near the aft CG would then be out of limits as = the weight of the gear [50 lb estimates] moves back under the baggage = compartment. Also that Charlie Kohler has a better way to calculate the = CG envelope. Is any of this true? Seems nuts to create the envelope in = gear down config? Any one know the truth? Tx Hap Perry

------_=_NextPart_001_01C46534.F9FA6680--