Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #24014
From: Skip Slater <skipslater@earthlink.net>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] IV's and IV-P's -- unsafe at any speed?
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 11:55:42 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Jim,
   Ron Galbraith and I were discusing this exact topic just yesterday.  These planes are now virtually uninsurable and are often being flown by pilots that don't fully understand the demands of such a high perfomance airplane.  The IV's have shown a proclivity to spin (and not recover) that's significant and certainly worthy of  Lancair's full attention.
   Whether all of these IV accidents have been due to pilot error, structural failure, engine problems or something else, I think the time has come for Lancair to end their deafening silence on the issue and try to get a full understanding of what's behind all the accidents and see if there's a common thread that can be addressed.  It may be little more than a required training program or a re-examination of the airplane's approved flight envelope or CG range.
   One big problem I've seen is builders abitrarily significantly raising gross weights for their planes above the factory recommendation. Who knows what arbitrary CG excursions are being made.  I've heard no warnings from Lancair on this practice and I think it's time that the issue was addressed by the kit's manufacturer to stress the limits to which the airframe was tested.
   If built and flown properly within design limits, I believe the IV's can be safe planes to fly.
   Skip Slater 
   N540ES
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster