Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 10:40:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d22.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.208] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b4) with ESMTP id 120469 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 10:38:55 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r2.6.) id q.8.4e9e198b (3964) for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:38:16 -0400 (EDT) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <8.4e9e198b.2def4058@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 10:38:16 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] IV's and IV-P's -- unsafe at any speed? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1086187096" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5110 -------------------------------1086187096 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim, I think your remarks are a little "over the top". You have really broadbrushed the subject. Please take a look at the NTSB reports in these matters and see if there are any design issues... or if its a matter of piloting. Jeff Edwards LIVP N619SJ -------------------------------1086187096 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jim,
 
I think your remarks are a little "over the top". You have really broad= brushed the subject. Please take a look at the NTSB reports in these matters= and see if there are any design issues... or if its a matter of piloting.
 
Jeff Edwards
LIVP N619SJ
-------------------------------1086187096--