Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 23:30:20 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m15.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.205] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3) with ESMTP id 98561 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 31 May 2004 22:46:54 -0400 Received: from YoSamuel@aol.com by imo-m15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r1.3.) id q.cd.e1e1107 (16781) for ; Mon, 31 May 2004 22:46:21 -0400 (EDT) From: YoSamuel@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 22:46:20 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: propjet props X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1086057980" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5110 -------------------------------1086057980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was wrong Lancair advertises (web site) the turbine at 370 MPH which equates to about 320 KTAS. However that is at FL260 and probably max cruise ITT. A far cry from 353 KTAS at 17,500 and not at max cruise ITT. Regards. Dave. -------------------------------1086057980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I was wrong Lancair advertises (web site) the turbine at 370 MPH w= hich equates to about 320 KTAS. However that is at FL260 and probably max cr= uise ITT. A far cry from 353 KTAS at 17,500 and not at max cruise ITT.
 
Regards. Dave.
-------------------------------1086057980--