Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 21:57:18 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-98521@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <RBEvans@eiihq.com>
Received: from [63.169.36.200] (HELO micromanagement)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3)
  with SMTP id 98415 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 31 May 2004 18:38:48 -0400
X-Original-Return-Path: <RBEvans@eiihq.com>
Received: from adsl-68-73-204-31.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net ([68.73.204.31])
          by micromanagement (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1.3) with SMTP ID 542
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>;
          Mon, 31 May 2004 18:37:03 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: <RBEvans@eiihq.com>
From: "Robert Evans Jr." <RBEvans@eiihq.com>
X-Original-To: "lml" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: vmo
X-Original-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 19:17:49 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <008a01c44765$7d65a960$0501a8c0@Ameritech>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

Hi
I have a POH for the IVP in which in which there is a vmo envelope graph. It
shows a .52 vmo. Is this correct. Is there indeed a vmo for the IVP. What
happens if one exceeds it. Is this defined by the critical speed. What does
this mean from a pratical standpoint. If one is at fl 240 and pushes the
nose over to descend to 220-vno one hits vmo. In a turbine it's even
easier.Is it an issue? Engineers out there please help. Thanks
Bob Evans
IVP N4TQ